Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz appeared on this week's airing of Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" to discuss the legal paths that the Trump campaign can take to win the presidency. However, he added, he does not think it is going to happen.
Here is the transcript between Dershowitz and FNC host Maria Bartiromo.
BARTIROMO: President Trump’s legal team has just three weeks left to gather enough evidence of fraud to contest the 2020 election results in court, something Sidney Powell, one of the lead attorneys on the case, says she can do.
Here is what she told me this week on “Mornings With Maria” on Friday.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
BARTIROMO: Will you be able to present, are you planning to present actual evidence of all that you have said, Dominion voting machines swapping votes from Trump to Biden, as well as an effort to actually change the results of an election? You will be able to prove that in court in the next two weeks?
SIDNEY POWELL, ATTORNEY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yes, I fully expect we will be able to prove all of it in court within the next two weeks, although the fraud case itself doesn’t have to be done within the two weeks.
But we have more than enough evidence now. We have more evidence now than half the prison population is imprisoned on.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
BARTIROMO: Joining me right now, outside legal analysis from constitutional legal scholar Alan Dershowitz. He was also part of President Trump’s impeachment defense team.
Alan, it is good to see you this morning. Thank you so much for being here.
DERSHOWITZ: Thank you.
BARTIROMO: Alan, we want to get your independent opinions here, because we know what Rudy Giuliani and what Sidney Powell has been charging.
Can you tell us if you believe there is a path for victory for President Trump, amidst these charges?
DERSHOWITZ: Well, let me give you my completely objective, not wishful thinking, constitutional analysis.
They have two or three legal constitutional paths. For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments, one, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day.
That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. And Justice Alito has already hinted that’s a winning issue.
They also have a winning issue on the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured, while others didn’t. Bush vs. Gore suggests that an equal protection argument can prevail.
The problem with that argument is, they don’t have the numbers necessarily to support it. If it’s right that Biden is ahead by some 70,000 or 80,000 votes, they have to show enough contested votes, under those two legal theories, to change the outcome.
The other legal theory they had, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There are enough votes to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that.
So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence. Maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.
And, of course, the media wants to see the evidence now, Alan.
BARTIROMO: But Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis continue to say that they aren’t going to litigate this in the public square, in the media space. They are going to drop lawsuits.
Now, I — one of my sources tells me that one of the first suits that they are going to bring is this week in Georgia. Let me show you a list of some of the things that the legal team of President Trump is charging and get your thoughts on this.
BARTIROMO: You just mentioned the computers.
This is — has to do with Smartmatic election software. They say, number one, observers prevented them from seeing the ballots. Number two, there’s inconsistent laws of curing ballots. Number three, the in-person voters told that they voted already and officials told not to look for defects and to backdate ballots before November 3.
Also, in terms of the computers and the software, Smartmatic election software was developed, Sidney Powell says, in Venezuela, with porous security and built-in functionality allowing the administrators to override security features.
We haven’t seen this, so we don’t know. But this is the kind of evidence that they say they have. Your reaction?
DERSHOWITZ: Well, evidence is very difficult to bring within two weeks or the three-week period. You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court.
I don’t know what Powell means when she says they have more than two weeks or three weeks to prove fraud. Once the electors are certified, and once they cast their vote, I can’t see any legal route to undoing that, even if they were to find fraud later on.
There’s certainly nothing in the Constitution about that. And so I think they do have to get their evidence in. The public has the right to see it. They don’t have the right to see it before the lawsuits are filed.
But she said that she thinks the lawsuits will be filed by this Friday. We have to see the evidence.
BARTIROMO: That’s right.
DERSHOWITZ: If the evidence is there, then there will be a trial.
Remember also, these have to go to state court first. There’s no such thing as a presidential election. There are 50 state elections. The Pennsylvania case is already in the Supreme Court. But these other cases have to go first through either the state or the federal trial courts before they get to the Supreme Court.
It doesn’t look like there will be enough time to bring the case to the Supreme Court before the safe harbor provision kicks in, before the Electoral College meets.
DERSHOWITZ: So, if you’re asking me what I think the outcome is going to be, notwithstanding the fact that there are legal paths to potential victory, I don’t think that the election is going to be reversed, based on the numbers that I see at the moment and based on the fact that I haven’t seen the evidence.
Their strongest case, if they have the evidence…
DERSHOWITZ: … is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of votes. That’s a wholesale argument, rather than a retail argument.
DERSHOWITZ: They can’t turn the election around on retail arguments, one observer here, a few votes here.
DERSHOWITZ: They need to make wholesale constitutional arguments.
And for that, they’re going to need overwhelming evidence, and I haven’t seen it.
Trending Political News
AOC wants to Fight Virus by Paying People to 'Stay Home'
On Thursday, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had the bright idea to suggest paying people to stay home in order to fight the coronavirus.
“To get the virus under control, we need to pay people to stay home," she said.
Biden COVID Task Force: ‘Hospitals will Collapse in Next Three Weeks’
Dr. Michael Osterholm, a member of Joe Biden's coronavirus task force, is now predicting that hospitals will be “collapsing in the next two to three weeks” because of coronavirus spikes across the country.
Dershowitz Reveals Trump’s Brilliant SCOTUS Strategy...And Says It Will Work!
Alan Dershowitz has finally weighed in on what he thinks is going to happen with this whole investigation into election fraud.
Dershowitz was interviewed by John Solomon and what he said was very interesting.
BREAKING: Sidney Powell Gives New Details on Server Seized in Germany
Last week, during the press conference held by President Trump's legal team, Sidney Powell was asked by a reporter about a server that was rumored to have been seized that contains some bombshell data.
According to the rumor, a raid occurred in Germany on a company called Scytl. During the raid, a server was seized that reportedly contains some rate data regarding the election.
The Kraken Has Been Released! Sidney Powell Releases EXPLOSIVE Details
Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, as well as a number of other top-notch attorneys have been unearthing some of the most unbelievable things in regards to this election.
Last week, they held a press conference to talk a little about some of the things that are to come.
Business Owners in New York Stand Up to Police and Health Dept After Gov. Cuomo's COVID Orders” (VIDEO)
People all over America are fed up with the strict orders that come from their governors in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
One state that has been at the top of the most tyrannical has been New York. Governor Andrew Cuomo is on a power trip and finally people are fed up with it and aren't going to take it anymore.