WaPo: 'Give Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing President'

Should the elite have more of a say in who is president of the United States? According to an op-ed on the Washington Post, they should.

On Tuesday, Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari published an article on WaPo titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

In the piece, she describes the Democratic Party as getting off to a "rocky start" and then suggests that choosing the nominee should be up to politicians instead of the people.

Breitbart reports:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Azari also suggests that parties use “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

Washinton Post is currently under fire for the piece.

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.


More Political News:

WATCH: Michael Bloomberg’s Let Them Die Mentality, Willing to Let Elderly Die

Michael Bloomberg is doing a bang-up job in making himself look bad and making a case as for why he should not be the next President of the United States.

Liberals are so delirious that they’ve convinced themselves that President Trump is killing millions of people right now. Now if Michael Bloomberg becomes president he actually will kill millions of people and he just admitted it. Continue reading…

Incompetent Squad Member Detained by Police During Ridiculous Protest at Airport

One of the bozos from “the squad”, U.S. Representative for Michigan’s 13th congressional district, Rashida Tlaib was recently detained by police during a protest in Detroit at the airport.

Initially, it was reported that Tlaib had been arrested, but upon further investigation, it was determined that she was only detained. Continue reading…

Senate Democrats BUSTED Going Overseas To Unite With Iran Against President Trump

Democrat Senator Chris Murphy, as well as a few other senators, were recently caught overseas meeting with Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Jahad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference last week.

Murphy’s office has been completely silent about the meeting and refuses to answer any questions about the meeting. They won’t even acknowledge that the meeting even occurred. Continue reading…

SHOCKING New Discovery Made Surrounding the Coronavirus as US Cases Increase

Scientists are learning more and more about the coronavirus that everyone is deathly concerned about. Recently, they discovered that the virus has the ability to cause heart failure.

While researchers scramble to come up with a cure for the virus, some are saying that there actually is a vaccine for it already, but is it enough? Continue reading…