Imagine being so holier than thou, that you oppose that death penalty for terrorist, BUT somehow find the courage to support abortion.
For 2020 presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg, this is an every day reality. He is against killing monsters, but finds it completely acceptable to murder unborn babies. What a brave life he must live.
The pro-abortion presidential candidate told The Hill that it is morally wrong to put suspected terrorists like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to death.
Breitbart reports Mohammed is accused of organizing the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on America. He faces charges for allegedly murdering 2,976 people. His trial before a military tribunal is scheduled for January.
“There are people who may deserve to die. I just don’t know anybody who deserves to kill them,” Buttigieg said, “I do believe that the moral consequence of killing somebody who is defenseless for any reason goes against certainly what I’ve been taught about the way we’re supposed to treat human life.”
So he claims to believes that killing defenseless is wrong, yet continues to support abortion. Is he mentally unstable or does he truly not understand the oxymoronic irony of his statement vs his morals.
When questioned about third trimester abortions back in May, here’s what the candidate had to say: “The bottom line is, as horrible as that choice is, that woman, that family, may seek spiritual guidance, they may seek medical guidance, but that decision isn’t going to be made any better, medically or morally, because the government is dictating how that decision should be made.”
His comments come on the heels of claiming that unborn babies can be aborted up until they draw their first breath, saying parts of the Bible mention “how life begins with breath.”
Buttigieg also stated that he “[trusts] women to draw the line.”
Yikes. Where exactly should the line be drawn, in his mind? If he is clearly against murdering the helpless, but completely supports abortion, then I don’t think he even knows where to draw the line.